Why Excessive Consumption Of Alcohol Can be Dangerous

In his book The Straight Truth Debunking the Negative Research behind 12-Step programs along with in the Rehab sector, Dr. Dodes is guilty of the same erroneous actions that he denounces. Dr. Dodes’s criticism of the scientific research

The theory behind addiction treatment is flawed and faulty. the method he has developed to address this “problem of addiction” ironically does not have any scientific evidence of its effectiveness, especially when compared with other methods of treatment.

We aren’t trying to discredit the claims of Dr. Dodes. We would like to discuss some of the statements he said on the Radio rehab centers near me Boston show and in his book to communicate what well-informed and well-researched science has to say about how we can help people and families struggling with addiction.

Here’s what he has to say in his speech, the things he doesn’t include, and what is wrong:

1. 12-Step Programs Do Not Work & Are Not Backed By Science

In spite of Dodes’ claims that Dr. Dodes’ claims that AA and 12-step therapies are generally ineffective and possibly dangerous the evidence is overwhelming that AA and treatments that encourage patients’ involvement in groups such as AA are one of some of the best and well-studied methods for helping to facilitate addictive behavior change. This conclusion is in line with the views of prominent organisations like those of National Institute of Health (NIH) and The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the American Psychiatric Association (APA) as well as the Department alcohol rehab near me of Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS), each of which recommends that patients join AA and similar organizations to help them recover.

The Dr. Dodes begins his criticism of AA and its associated treatment by citing a study from 1991 that was conducted by Walsh and co-authors that was published in the highly regarded New England Journal of Medicine (you can download the paper for free at nejm.org to read it yourself). In this article treating a huge amount of patients with alcohol-related problems was studied. The author Dr.

Effective but inpatient treatment is effective

Dodes noted in his book that inpatient treatment that was compulsory provided the highest results when compared to AA by itself. However, what he did not note was the fact that the inpatient program consisted of a 12-step-based program that included AA sessions during treatment and the requirement to attend AA sessions three times per week following discharge for an entire year, following the treatment. Also, it is important to note that when comparing the outcomes of alcohol (average amount of drinks consumed per day and the number of drinks consumed per month, the number of binges, As well as severe signs of alcohol abuse), AA alone was exactly the same as inpatient treatment that was based on AA. However, the researcher Dr. Dodes used this study to show that AA is not as effective but inpatient treatment is effective which is a completely distorted as well as a misleading and wrong interpretation of the results.